Yesterday, there was a modicum of justice in the case when a Turkish court found six guilty in his death.
Korkmaz was savagely beaten on June 2, 2013 during the Gezi Protests. In a statement to authorities before he died, Korkmaz he described the attack:
Five or six people came up to me, they beat me with clubs on my head, back, shoulder and legs. I fell to the ground….Yesterday I didn’t have difficulty in speaking, but today I can’t remember. One of my teeth is loose because of the incident. My head hurts, I have difficulty speaking. I don’t know who beat me or why. They were wearing civilian clothes. I want to make a complaint
Korkmaz was admitted to a hospital after making his statement, but soon fell into a coma. He died on July 10, 2013.
As so often – too often – happens in Turkey, there was official resistance to a transparent investigation. Amnesty’s researcher on Turkey, Andrew Gardner, noted in a blog last year, Turkish authorities seemed determined to undermine the quest for justice in the case. Following the attack, the Governor of Eskisehir said that police hadn’t been involved and that Ali Ismail Korkmaz had been beaten up ‘by his friends.’ Footage from a CCTV camera was deleted in the days following the incident, but was subsequently recovered by experts from the gendarmerie.
The Korkmaz family has described the sentences as too lenient. Amnesty, which traditionally does not comment on the length of sentences, simply notes, in a statement issued after the trial:
Two police officers, Mevlüt Saldoğan and Yalçın Akbulut were convicted for lesser offence of deliberate wounding causing the death of 19 year-old Ali Ismail Korkmaz and sentenced to 10 years, 10 months and 10 years after reductions, respectively, rather than the charge of deliberate killing under which Mevlüt Saldoğan had been prosecuted, which carries a life sentence.
During the trial, a video was shown to the court of the police officers and civilians beating Ali Ismail Korkmaz. Police officer Mevlüt Saldoğan is seen in the video repeatedly kicking him in the head as he lay motionless on the ground after the attack.
Two other police officers who were part of the group attacking demonstrators but were not shown beating Ali Ismail Korkmaz were acquitted of all charges due to “lack of evidence”.
Three civilians were convicted of taking part in the attack and sentenced to six years, eight months after reductions, A fourth civilian was sentenced to three years, four months for assisting the attack and released from prison due to time served on remand.
In its statement, Amnesty draws attention to the difficulties that were faced bringing the case to justice and to the heroic efforts of the Korkmaz family, their lawyers, and journalists in preventing yet another cover-up in a case of police brutality. For its part, Amnesty waged a long campaign to keep the case in the public eye.
Nonetheless, this verdict is so important because so few cases of police abuse are successfully brought to trial in Turkey.
Two further cases where there is strong evidence that police use of force resulted in deaths at Gezi Park protests remain unresolved. The trial in the case of Abdullah Cömert who was hit by a tear gas canister in Antakya continues. According to witnesses, 15 year-old Berkin Elvan, who died after 269 days in a coma, was also hit by a tear gas canister fired by police. However, prosecutors in Istanbul have failed to identify the law enforcement officers responsible for firing tear gas at the scene. Hundreds of others who were injured by law enforcement officers are still awaiting justice.
Indeed, on the day that sentences were issued in the case of Ali Ismail Korkmaz, a secrecy order was issued in the investigation of the killing of 12 year old Nihat Kazanhan, allegedly from a policeman’s bullet. Earlier this month, another secrecy order was issued in the death of Umit Kurt, also allegedly by police. Without transparency, the culture of impunity lives on.
At the sentences were issued, the judge reportedly told the victim’s friends and family members that they should not protests in the courtroom, but should instead protest democratically outside. When they did so, they were met by teargas and water cannon.
St. Lawrence University